Here’s What Isn’t Being Discussed
On Tuesday October 1st, the Penacook Village Association is hosting a forum on housing. Presenting will be representatives from CATCH, NH Housing Finance Authority and the city manager.
Everyone agrees that there is a demand for housing, not only in Concord but nationally. And I believe everyone agrees that it is becoming more difficult to find and develop affordable housing.
Allan Herschlag - Penacook Ward 1 CouncilorAffordable housing comes in a variety of shapes and sizes; workforce, low income and Section 8. Each program is designed to provide affordable housing for those of various incomes.
As I wrote previously, workforce housing is described as a family of three earning 60% of the area median income and and paying no more than 30% of their income for rent and utilities. For a family of four making 100% of the area median income, paying no more than 30% of their income for mortgage, taxes and insurance. The other two programs also place restriction on how much income can be used for housing.
I have advocated for mixed income developments and for some types of housing density bonuses to provide more opportunities for affordable housing and to assist in making it affordable for
developers. What I have heard back from the city is that even though other communities in NH do this it would be too difficult for Concord.
So here’s what you will hear. You will hear that there is a large demand for affordable housing. You will hear that there is also a a demand for more workers with New Hampshires unemployment rate at below 3%. You will hear that more people living in your community will add vitality and bring in new businesses.
Here’s what you won’t hear. You won’t hear how the added costs of services for those moving into a
community will be paid for. School costs are in the range of $14,000 per student. And while there isn’t always a one to one relationship between more students and additional costs, education, recreation, police, fire and rescue costs all need to be considered.
So what about assisted living or age restricted development. With only three ambulances currently being staffed, and the cost of staffing a fourth ambulance estimated to be in the three quarter of a million dollars, even housing that won’t bring additional students to the schools can impact your property taxes.
And what you won’t hear is that even if Concord provides more housing, there is no guarantee that jobs will follow. Concord and Penacook are very desirable communities to live in. What happens if we provide housing and few jobs are created. What happens if Concord becomes a bedroom community for Manchester and other communities.
So here’s what I think. While it would be impossible to always have a perfect balance
between residential development and commercial growth, it should at least be a consideration when a community is being asked to provide more housing. As long as NH relies on property taxes to pay for a large portion of state and local services, without corresponding commercial growth, expenses for residential property owners becomes onerous.
I continue to believe that mixed income neighborhoods make more sense than failed and failing 1960’s housing models based on income. We have moved away from neighborhoods that provide local shops and services and moved to the Loudon Road model. This is why I have supported form based code, because it can allow for a mix of uses in neighborhoods that have traditionally segregated commercial and residential uses. Why not neighborhoods that permit commercial, retail, schools and residential uses while providing for a mix of incomes?
I believe there are two components to affordable housing. First is housing that is affordable for people to live in and the other side of the coin is ensuring that the community can afford to provide the schools, recreation and safety services for those moving in.
As we discuss ways to provide affordable housing for those who live and want to live in our community let’s not forget that it is also important to provide the resources to make it affordable for those already living here. Allan Herschlag - Penacook Ward 1 Councilor
9/30/2019 04:38:14 pm
The only thing that seems to be stuck in the 1960s is your perception of what a community should be. Your "I continue to believe that mixed income neighborhoods make more sense" reads like the most thinly veiled NIMBY talking points. As a matter of fact, the overwhelming majority of your points mirror common NIMBY talking points, most of which have been debunked time and again. As a Granite Stater who values pragmatism, I can't stand this mindset that seems to be so prevalent in this state that anything which threatens a white middle/upper-middle class existence must be bad for community. Having lived in diverse, "mixed income" (a legalese way of blowing off the less fortunate by sounding sterile and factual) communities, with similar struggles to what we have here (believe it or not, we are not unique), I can say that the diversity of ideas and viewpoints that a truly diverse community (race, age, sexual orientation, income, etc. etc.) experiences offsets essentially all of your concerns above, which are mostly based in theory and feeling. Our community (I am a Penacook resident) is the whitest, least robust community I've ever lived in, and it's also the 2nd most socially miserable and outwardly unfriendly community I've lived in (2nd only to a community in rural NH). I appreciate that you have your views, opinions, and reasoning, but all I can say is I sure hope your pedantic and semantic logic does not trump what would be real progress for our community.
Comments are closed.
Merrimack Valley Voice Recommended